Michigan Department of Natural Resources

   Michigan.gov Home   DNR Home

   Special Exhibits | 20th Century | First People-1900 | MI Historical Museum | MI Historical Center     

Schooner in the Sand, Michigan Historical Museum
Unlocking the Secrets of a Great Lakes Shipwreck
Go to:

Schooner in the Sand Home Page

A Shape in the Sand

An Earlier Discovery

Excavation: Digging into the Wreck

Learning from Artifacts and Documents

The Artifacts

Ports of Call

World Market

Unanswered Questions

Time Line

What Did the Ship Look Like?

Painting of the schooner as it might have looked under sail by Peter RindlisbacherArchaeologists and maritime historians have a general idea of the ship's appearance, based on measurements and other discoveries during the excavations. They know that the schooner was 62 feet long and almost 18 feet wide. It was built primarily of white oak and had two masts.

Because the wreck is incomplete—lacking deck and masts—some details must be taken from other ships of the period. Artist Peter Rindlisbacher painted this picture of what the Millecoquins schooner might have looked like under sail. This ship had a top speed of about 10.5 knots—not much more than 12 miles per hour.

Illustration shows that a modern ship is more than 10 times longer than the schooner in the sand.

The Eastern Carolina University archaeologists determined that the schooner's deck had been burned off. Notch marks in these charred timbers made them think that someone—local people or other fishermen—set the fire to make it easier to retrieve iron spikes and other useful hardware from the wreck. Unfortunately, the loss of the deck makes accurate calculation of the ship's tonnage (carrying capacity) impossible and identification of the schooner more difficult.

According to William Ives's 1849 report, the masts were broken when he saw the wreck, but their stubs were still upright. The ECU team found evidence of where the masts had stood, but no pieces of the masts themselves.

In the 1830s, schooners outnumbered steamers five to one on the Great Lakes. Sailing ships were less expensive to build and maintain than steam-powered ships. However, schooners had the disadvantage of depending on the wind for power.

View of the schooner's recreated half hull from the bow toward the stern.A recreation of half of the ship provides a backdrop for the Schooner in the Sand exhibit. The recreated hull is based on measurements of what was left of the wreck. It is as long as the original ship, but only half as wide.

Drawing of arrangement plan by C.T. McCutcheon, Jr., for Association for Great Lakes Maritime History

The ship's hull included berths for crew or paying passengers in an aft cabin, the cargo hold and a captain's quarters in the stern. Archaeologists found nearly all of the vessel's dishes and food containers in the stern cabin, so the ship's small crew may have eaten there as well. There was white paint on the ship's bow when it was first exposed. The drawing by T. C. McCutcheon for the Association for Great Lakes Maritime History shows the arrangement plan of the hull.

Who Sailed this Ship?

Excavation of the Millecoquins wreck uncovered no clues to the identity of the men who sailed it. On similar schooners in this period, the captain was often a part owner or the son or brother of the owner. A vessel this size needed only two or three additional crew members. Often these men had family ties to the captain or came from the same town.


Contact the Michigan Historical Museum with your question or comment abou this page.

          Accessibility Policy | Privacy Policy | Link Policy | Security Policy
          Copyright © State of Michigan